RCS encourages one to put its files in a directory named RCS - otherwise, they clutter up the original directory with near-matches for every controlled file.
Prefixing the directory with a dot seems like a good plan. Somehow, I doubt the CVS community would be open to that change. I suspect the FSF's apparent decision to reject any change to RCS out of hand on the basis that the concept of people wanting non-collaborative revision control boggles their minds will apply here as well. Given the contents of README.Debian, it would seem to me that the more appropriate fix, if one were going to be applied, would be to add the exact file names 'CVS' and 'RCS' to the list of excluded files. However, as both of these are admittedly deprecated version control systems, I'm guessing that won't happen either. -- apache2 conf.d and sites-enabled oops https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
