I am very much disappointed by the decision re: amarok1.4 and Amarok 2. There is one really glaring issue that I find amazing. The lack of a resonable media device manager with out Amarok1.4.
It seems to be the flavour of the month and a very Microsoft attitude to release incomplete software in K/Ubuntu. The need to have the bleeding edge is over taking the need for functionality. KDE4 on Hardy before 80% of the 3.5 functionality was available. Amarok 2 before the media device manager is complete. It is not helping the reputation or the penetration of linux and Ubuntu. As for the "Must Be Maintained" policy I think it need a rethink and an appropriate balance of functionality versus latest release be struck. I feel the KDE4 release and inclusion has been a perfect example of why the policy is flawed. Just my 2 cents worth. The guys here and at KDE are doing an awesome job, no doubt about that, just think a little more thought is needed in the make up of the great Ubuntu products. Keep up the good work. -- [jaunty] we should have both Amarok 2.x and Amarok 1.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
