2Reinhard Tartler: > In ubuntu, we do not want ANY applications to be built against the > *unstripped* variants of libavcodec as a saftey guard. If users want to > do that at home, fine, but we actually cannot do that in ubuntu because > that introduces just even more confusion as we already have in this bug.
Understood. However, I'm not sure, that I got this sentence correctly: > This means: Building against the regular libavcodec-dev package and then > replacing libavcodec-unstripped-52... ... English is not my native language... Do you mean "Build against regular libavcodec-dev and then replace this libavcodec-dev by libavcodec- unstripped-52"?. Or, should I replace libavcodec-unstripped-52 by something? Side note: I'm pretty sure, kradio does not require "unstripped" libav*-dev packages.. However, I can't install "regular" ones as well, if I have "kubuntu-restricted-extras" installed (and I have it, since it's useful for me), because they conflict. That's the problem.. -- libxxx-unstripped should also Provide libxxx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
