Tom Chiverton wrote: > Shipping the older driver version has got to be a serious thought, I > think - at the moment the user experience on one of the most common > embeded video chip sets will be 'Jaunty broke my system'. > I agree, I installed Jaunty on my laptop, the good thing was that the wireless started working for the first time! But the graphics are sluggisch. I enabled UXA and it doesn't crash but it's slowish.
Ubuntu's demise will be that changes are pushed that are not ready for release or break the system. Watch how many sysadmins reverted to Debian after the RAID debacle. It took 1.4 year to fix the bug that Ubuntu introduced in RAID (the bug was never in Debian). It was also never acknowledged as a failure. I think there is a chance that after all these bug reports and people that complain - people that took the effort of installing a prerelease Jaunty and reporting bugs! Important people! ... that Canonical/Ubuntu will still ship the shitty driver and just bad luck for those 10% of customers. And that this will put off those people that took the effort to participate. So, concluding, I sincerely hope that 'they' will revert to the older driver that worked splendidly under Intrepid. Or give a choice while upgrading. Cheers, -- (Needs UXA) Kubuntu Jaunty Intel 945 GM - Poor sluggish graphics performance in Kate text, etc. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342923 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs