> I read in another bug though that ubuntu devs don't want bugs filed > upstream and instead want them filed with LP: ... > This inconsistency makes it difficult to know when to file upstream and > when not to.
I'm not speaking for Canonical, I'm not even using Ubuntu. I'm only watching this bug because I am one of the upstream kernel driver developers (ieee1394; Carl's report was loosely related to 1394). If there is a possibility that a bug is an upstream bug --- and if your distributor has no manpower to look at bugs and to get in touch with upstream themselves --- then file a report with upstream. Best would be of course if one of you could test an unmodified kernel.org kernel for your report; ideally the latest release*. (Note, reports about kernels with proprietary drivers inserted into them do not have much value for bugzilla.kernel.org because such kernels cannot really be debugged.) *) Does Ubuntu have packages of vanilla kernels? -- skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317227 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
