My typical use of a computer is writing code, compilation and
test/debugging.

A small test performed with the Asus P5QL SE mainboard:
1) Start "make clean && make" in a terminal (uses >30 minutes, which is slooow 
compared to other older computers)
2) Run "top" in another terminal

Output from "top":
-------- 8< --------
top - 09:16:34 up 14 min,  3 users,  load average: 4.10, 3.40, 1.81
Tasks: 155 total,   2 running, 153 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  0.3%us,  0.2%sy,  0.0%ni,  0.0%id, 99.5%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
Mem:   2072260k total,  1245388k used,   826872k free,    25856k buffers
Swap:        0k total,        0k used,        0k free,   637636k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND            
                 
 5496 root      20   0  418m  46m  11m R    1  2.3   0:34.00 Xorg               
                 
 6100 petter    20   0 21216 3104 1780 S    1  0.1   0:00.52 gnome-screensav    
                 
 8956 petter    20   0  2416 1172  876 R    1  0.1   0:00.44 top                
                 
    1 root      20   0  2120 1076  640 S    0  0.1   0:01.18 init              
-------- 8< --------

"us" was typically <10% and rarely ~30% for a long time (a lot of >90%wa
as above) periodically during the half hour or so. When the >90%wa
occurs (which can be frequently), far more than a minute (!) can be used
on a tiny cpp-file. To my knowledge no other HDD-time-consuming
processes are running. Periodically the system seems to be OK, with
typically ~50% of the time in "us" and ~50% in "id" (due to usage of
only one CPU in the dual core?).

IMHO: a lot of time is spent waiting for I/O to complete. More CPU time
should be spent on compiling the code (User CPU time). The Asus P5QL SE
mainboard (and a lot of other mainboards?) is not compatible with the
current Ubuntu 8.10 (kernel 2.6.27-11).

The trick from the GuiGuy did not work for me. The only units connected
to SATA during this test was the HDD (WDC WD2500KS-00MJB0). No IDE
devices.

I hope this is relevant for the slow SATA bug. Let me know if I can
perform other tests to help solve this issue.

-- 
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to