On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:35:54 -0000 Stefan Bader <stefan.ba...@canonical.com> wrote:
> It looks a bit mingled in the report, but: > > abinum = 23 > > This means the ABI is 23, so as long as your kernel build does not > change things that cause kernel functions to have different arguments > or to vanish, you won't need to do the other packages. But if you do, I see. > you would have to rebuild them in the order kernel lum (if this > exists for that release), lbm, lrm. Maybe the following page explains > it better: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMaintenance Thanks for the link, I'll read it tomorrow. > > Your output: > prev_revision = 23.48ubuntu1~kg0 > revision = 23.48ubuntu1~kg0ubuntu1 > > This looks like you already (at least) two more release entries in > your changelog. In that case the abi files are expected in > debian/abi/2.6.24-23.48ubuntu1~kg0. The location _always_ changes when > you add a new release. Ah-ha. not done automatically then. Thanks, I'll have another try at the package tomorrow and see what happens. kk > -- linux packages in hardy-security FTBFS in a ppa https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/333766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
