Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:24:41 -0000 Jonas Pedersen wrote: > >> Breaks: udev (<< 136-1) > > Shouldn't that be Conflicts: udev (...)?
I don't think so. I just copied the Breaks part from the existing version in Ubuntu. Looked at bit in the documentation and below quotes are from the documentation. "A Conflicts entry should almost never have an "earlier than" version clause. This would prevent dpkg from upgrading or installing the package which declared such a conflict until the upgrade or removal of the conflicted-with package had been completed. Instead, Breaks may be used (once Breaks is supported by the stable release of Debian). " Above is from the Conflicts parts. This Breaks have an "earlier than" part. "Normally a Breaks entry will have an "earlier than" version clause; such a Breaks is introduced in the version of an (implicit or explicit) dependency which violates an assumption or reveals a bug in earlier versions of the broken package. This use of Breaks will inform higher-level package management tools that broken package must be upgraded before the new one. " And above is from the Breaks part of the debian-policy documentation. -- please sync hdapsd 1:0.0.20081004-1 from Debian/experimental https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
