Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Ludovico Cavedon <ludovico.cave...@gmail.com> writes: >> Applications built against the stripped version should be able to run >> against the unstripped version without recompilation (and in fact >> qutecom/wengophone is able to); the application should just have fewer >> or more codecs available (are there other differences btw?). > > check debian/strip.sh in the ffmpeg-debian package
Looks like there are no other differences >> I want to be able to build the official package using the stripped-dev >> libs and run it against the unstripped runtime. > > well, that's how all packages in debian and ubuntu are currently > built. I fail to see the problem here? That was in answer to bojo42, who was proposing unstripped-dev packages. >> Yes I could work in a chroot, but sometimes it is annoying.... > > I can only recommend building packages in clean chroots... I agree, but sometimes for development and testing it is convenient to work outside. > The only valid use case for this request I could imagine would be if > there was some packages that really requires the > libavcodec-unstripped-52 installed and does not work with libavcodec52 > at all. I haven't seen such a package so far, though... I am not referring to this case. My use case is: qutecom/wengophone video support is disabled at runtime if ffmpeg is stripped. Currently I am not able to compile and run it and test the video, without keeping on switching between -dev packages and unstripped packages, -- libxxx-unstripped should also Provide libxxx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
