Bryce wasn't getting mad. His point is that a bug report's usefulness increases the more succinctly it can be written. Personally, I suspect that the engineers at Intel and X.org, and Ubuntu are aware of the current state of things.
Considering the prevalence of Intel graphics hardware, it could hardly be otherwise. I also think Snover's reply was very on point. Like I said though, I don't think it's going to be any surprise to any of the engineers involved. My plan is to wait until things kind of start working, (which I figure will be around the release of the 9.04 beta (I will keep checking the Alpha releases though), and file bug reports on what is still missing at that time. Hans jspudz wrote: > I agree with Snover. This issue is more then just "some" people > experiencing problems.....its everyone with an intel card. Like he said > throw a stone and you will hit it. > > What exactly do you need, if not glxgears then tell us what. There are > plenty of people with intel cards that are willing to provide the input > you need including me but at this point we need to know what. > > The thing we all need to get at this point is its broke for all intel > cards. Dont get mad because everyone with an intel card is reporting > here because its broke. It's not their fault a release broke intel > support. I see no point in starting multiple threads on this, as it > will just turn out to be multiple threads saying the same thing this one > is. > -- [i965, etc.] Poor graphics performance on Intel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
