Quoting Thierry Carrez (thierry.car...@ubuntu.com): > I'm kinda busy those days, but I'll refresh my PPA tomorrow with a > 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3.5~ppa1 that builds on the recent security release. > > Concerning the official intrepid update, I'll file a SRU report and let > the ubuntu-sru powers decide if the fix is worth the regression risk, as > this is definitely a complex patch. I welcome Samba developers comments
Indeed, when I saw the patch sent by Kai to Debian bug #500129, I was a little bit scared....:-) I initially intended to have the patch in Debian lenny but its size makes me hesitate (the policy for lenny as of now is not as strict as the polocy to update Debian stable....but, still, we're quite close to the release and our release managers ask all Debian maintainers to be very careful about patches fixing no release-crtical bugs. I think that, for Debian, I'll finally balance to include the patch, putting confidence in the work of two Samba Team developers...:-)...but that will not be an update for a stable version and I would not push it if it was for Debian stable. I suspect that Ubuntu's policy is about the same and, as Kai mentioned, it would be perfectly understandable if the patch is not accepted. -- gvfsd-smb crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
