Sorry for taking so long to respond, I had a long holiday. > I'm not sure we should be recommending the restricted-extras packages. > I'm not sure if there is a concrete policy on this, a suggests may be ok. > What would happen if I sponsored the rest of the changes without that one?
Basically that would be fine of course. But it would be really nice if people that have the multiverse repositories enabled would pull in the unstripped versions of ffmpeg, because without it most presets are useless (that is why Debian has such a small amount of presets). On the winff forums [1] most questions are when people are using a restricted version of ffmpeg and are not able to convert the files to the type they request. So indeed, at the very least have the suggests (I assume that using Suggests would follow Debian-policy on the Recommends/Suggests). Unfortunately the policies and license issues with ffmpeg are not very understandable for the novice users. Would it be appropriate to mention this in the description of the winff package? Paul [1] http://winff.org/forums -- [jaunty] Presets should be updated because the ffmpeg version in Ubuntu is newer than in Debian https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
