On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:20:59AM -0000, John Vivirito wrote: > On 12/04/2008 06:58 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:01:59PM -0000, Pander wrote: > >> License is multiple times in the .js source code, see > >> > >> ~/.mozilla/firefox/qh2aiwql.default/extensions/[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep -riI > >> mit *|grep -i license > >> chrome/content/shared/passwordmeter.js:License: MIT License (see below) > >> chrome/content/shared/passwordmeter.js:Modified: 20060620 - added MIT > >> License > >> chrome/content/foxmarks-utils.js: License: > >> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php > >> chrome/content/foxmarks-utils.js: * Released under the MIT license > > > > Folks should really put a license file in the .xpi ... otherwise we > > need to review each individual file and if there is any that doesnt > > have an explicit license hint, its not sure. > > > > We probably can remove preference .js files and install.rdf as well as > > chrome.manifest from the list of files that require an explicit > > copyright, but most authors forget license headers in .xul/xml files. > > > > > > - Alexander > > > When i spoke to author about this he stated that it is now nonfree and > when i dug harder into him for the license he stated all about the > copyright so i email him back stating i needed license not copyriguht > and never heard back from him. >
All now nonfree? Then dump it. Its not worth running after someone who wants to keep stuff nonfree. Remind him that he shall update his extension license info on addons.mozilla.org ... if he hasn't done it yet. - Alexander -- [needs-packaging] Foxmarks (Firefox extension) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
