A few things on your comments :
-> at the moment I have started the package, I took the latest from
ubuntu, which does not contains yet the -doc package... Of course it
makes sense to use that now. This is also the cae with cdbs, since I
have based my work on the previous ubuntu version (which was
2.4.4-0ubuntu2).
-> as far as I remember, I dropped the conflicts/replace after
some discussion with upstream... I have to check in detail why it was
justified (or at least why I considered it as justified at the
moment...)
-> and of course the package should be based on the latest ubuntu
package which in is closer of debian. I'll tackle that tomorrow...
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Holbach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things:
> - you seem to have dropped the -doc packages
> - you dropped the conflicts/replaces of the -common package
> - you chose not to use CDBS (which is fine, but can't we have the package
> closer to what Debian did just to make syncing easier in the future?)
> - do you think we can base the package on the bakery2.4 we have in Jaunty
> now?
>
> --
> Please sponsor bakery2.6-2.6.0 into jaunty
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282596
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
Ma vie |
Mes recettes | http://www.reponses.net
Mes images |
--
Please sponsor bakery2.6-2.6.0 into jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282596
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
