Is there any explanation from the developer why the string was changed to "commercial"? Shouldn't it be clear to most of us that it's false to claim so? Was it some last-minute attempt to make it more "understandable" for the common folks, with the expense of making the myth about oss being non-commercial even more stronger.
I think that even "Show closed-source applications" could be okay, but maybe proprietary is better. -- proprietary != commercial https://launchpad.net/bugs/44925 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
