Martin,

in the "practical" part, Margarita's patch differred from mine in the
following:

In hers, Jujuy wouldn't apply DST which (as of early last Saturday, was
wrong, but now it's right... that is Jujuy decided it would NOT apply
DST on the afternoon of Saturday 18th, setting a new record of non-
anticipation).

In hers, she is not considering that Salta, La Pampa, Neuquén and Río
Negro are no longer part of the America/Argentina/Cordoba timezone and
people from those Provinces should have to chose another timezone that
wouldn't apply DST this year... the only problem (which is small) is
that times in the past will eventually be wrong on those places. My
patch created a new timezone (America/Argentina/Salta) for this
provinces (considering Salta the most populated city among these four
provinces), following the tzdata recommendations.

The other thing I did was to reorder the provinces within the files
following the recommendations in the zone.tab file (which hasn't any
effect on the inner working of tzdata, only for humans reading the
sources).


Anyway, since my patch had wrong data for Jujuy, I'm enclosing a new one with 
that corrected.

HTH

PS: Martin, feel free to contact me off-launchpad if you need more info.


** Attachment added: "Newer patch to tzdata2008h to handle latest timezone 
configuration for Argentina (considering Jujuy last minute changes)"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18731857/tzdata2008-10-19.patch

-- 
Argentina is 1 hour ahead when it shouldn't
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278419
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to