I'm attaching two patches here, one which changes all of the <prefer> to <accept>, and one which removes all of the <alias> sections in ttf- arphic-uming altogether.
I'm assuming that there is some reason why uming is declaring aliases in its configuration file, which not a single other font in fontconfig appears to do, so I suppose that the <accept> patch should be the least controversial. However, I don't understand why the font configuration for uming does this. Is there some language reason? In addition, why is it declaring itself as preferred for the sans alias, which *doesn't even exist*? But I'll file another bug about those issues. ** Attachment added: "Patch removing <alias> sections from ttf-arphic-uming" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5035363/uming-noalias.patch -- 0.1.20060928-2 makes default gnome fonts ugly https://launchpad.net/bugs/71121 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
