The cpufreq developers disagree on that. And I strongly disagree on that. On my notebook, 1000MHz is a lot faster that 800MHz, because it makes the memory clock and access-time much faster. It's not just the CPU that scales up.
But anyone should understand that conservative is still better that performance. At least when I filed the bug, either ondemand, userspace, performance or powersave was the cpufreq policy for "dynamic" in that order. -- kde-guidance-powermanager: support "conservative" CPUFreq gouvernor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
