fusesmb is a fairly decent work around from the home user perspective.  In
light of the fact that upstream isn't addressing the fix or at least it
isn't available yet, does anyone know of a way to ask Canonical to downgrade
to the version of samba that worked properly in Gutsy?  Would it be THAT
much of a dependency problem?

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 15:03, wolfwitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Agreed/Ditto. I've pretty much given up on it. The best "solution" I've
> found is to set up shortcuts to every share I use, since browsing is
> pretty much impossible. This isn't really Ubuntu's fault since it is a
> problem with an upstream vendor, but it's a bit ridiculous that this bug
> has been know about for almost seven months now and hasn't been fixed.
> It's been reworded and duped all over the place, and it seems it's being
> spun more than fixed.
>
> --
> nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>


-- 
I've discovered the key to success is to never give up.  You either learn
the right way, or you run out of ways to do it wrong.  A win/win situation!

-- 
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to