*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 180478 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180478
I fixed that problem in an other manner:
I did aptitude download libflashsupport on a 32bit system and copied the
deb package to my 64bit system.
Then created a directory under /usr/local/src. In my case I called it
libflashsupport-i386
Then:
dpkg -x libflashsupport_1.9-0ubuntu2_i386.deb
/usr/local/src/libflashsupport-i386
/usr/local/src/libflashsupport-i386/usr/lib:
ldd libflashsupport.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xf7f6d000)
libpulse.so.0 => /usr/lib32/libpulse.so.0 (0xf7eff000)
libgnutls.so.13 => /usr/lib32/libgnutls.so.13 (0xf7e85000)
libc.so.6 => /lib32/libc.so.6 (0xf7d26000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib32/libSM.so.6 (0xf7d1d000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib32/libICE.so.6 (0xf7d05000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib32/libX11.so.6 (0xf7c17000)
libcap.so.1 => /lib32/libcap.so.1 (0xf7c13000)
librt.so.1 => /lib32/librt.so.1 (0xf7c0a000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib32/libdl.so.2 (0xf7c05000)
libm.so.6 => /lib32/libm.so.6 (0xf7bdf000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib32/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7bc6000)
libtasn1.so.3 => /usr/lib32/libtasn1.so.3 (0xf7bb4000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib32/libz.so.1 (0xf7b9e000)
libgcrypt.so.11 => /lib32/libgcrypt.so.11 (0xf7b35000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x46452000)
libxcb-xlib.so.0 => /usr/lib32/libxcb-xlib.so.0 (0xf7b31000)
libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib32/libxcb.so.1 (0xf7b18000)
libgpg-error.so.0 => /lib32/libgpg-error.so.0 (0xf7b14000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib32/libXau.so.6 (0xf7b11000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib32/libXdmcp.so.6 (0xf7b0c000)
looked ok for me.
cd /usr/lib32/
ln -s /usr/local/src/libflashsupport-i386/usr/lib/libflashsupport.so
ldconfig
Started firefox and played a youtube video. While playing:
lsof | grep libflashsupport
npviewer. 14357 croessner mem REG 253,0 10924
2901271 /usr/local/src/libflashsupport-i386/usr/lib/libflashsupport.so
So, as you can see it is working and you do not need to compile or
replace the 64bit package. But it was really great to have a
lib32flahsupport package for intrepid. This is a sad solution to compile
or to do my trick. Just only advanced users will get this to work. So
please a word to the current package maintainer: Can you please create
the required package? I would do this, if I knew more about debian
packaging.
--
libflashsupport useless on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
