Firefox cannot be distributed in a modified form. The whole point of the branding from Mozzila's point of view was that there should not be 100's of modified Firefox's floating about
If it can not be modified and distributed by *definition* it can not be in main... Otherwise you are saying we can take Iceweasle and put FF branding on it? C On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 16:11 +0000, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Prateek Karandikar wrote: > > "There is no doubt in my mind that the right thing to do is leave the > > anti-phishing service on, and leave Firefox in main." > > > > Do you believe that it is acceptable to have application software in > > main that you are not free to modify and distribute? Doesn't this > > contradict the Ubuntu "main" Component license Policy( > > http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/licensing )? > > > All of the software in question can be freely modified and distributed. > > Mark > -- Disclaimer: By sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient" 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it where I please. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
