Fortunately I don't have to make the decision, but some of you will. In fact, all options (other than Mozilla removing that restriction) have flaws. So, who will decide and when will a decision be made?
Personally, I don't like the idea of presenting a EULA to any of our users in the default installation. So why don't we switch to "abrowser" (1) in the default install and add "firefox-3.0-branding" to ubuntu-restricted-extras? (1) BTW: I'd love to see it called "Web Browser" instead of "A Web Browser" in the Gnome menu and I think the "Mozilla Firefox" text at the title bar should be changed also. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
