Ever heard of the concept of an end case? The fact that 99 packages build with py_central doesn't negate the possibility that 1 will exercise something in an odd way without being incorrect. The conclusion doesn't follow from your premise. You complained that without the rules, you could not identify what the problem is, the rules were given, yet there is no followup. It is not correct to mark the bug invalid (unworthy of further investigation) without having examined the rules to verify or refute your hypothesis.
How many py_central packages include modules written in C? I suspect the pool of working packages just shrank remarkably, if there are now, say 10 such working packages. Your would still assume that mine is busted? In any event, getting rid of py_central... On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > No. The bug's invalid. Lot's of py_central package build on AMD64. > The bug is in your debian/rules, but I'm not here to teach you Debian > packaging. > > ** Changed in: ubuntu > Status: New => Invalid > > -- > py_central-based package doesn't build on amd64 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256992 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- py_central-based package doesn't build on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
