2011/1/24 Thorsten Wilms <t...@freenet.de> > The reason I decided against the table is that it's hard to edit and > didn't make it obvious at a glance what is open or closed.
I know how important the KISS principle is for a wiki, but as long as our pages aren't based on complex custom templates and we have people which can maintain our pages, it's OK. I think the table had a rather clear way of presenting if the task is open or closed. The green "Active" labels attract notice quite efficiently, IMHO. The "Specs" page makes that categorizing even more clear, but it's hard to read the names of the tasks. Besides, the table looks much more professional and well-designed, which is also important in our case. So, my proposal is: 1. Move complete tasks from the table to some other page, called "completed tasks" / "team portfolio" / whatever 2. Maybe separate active tasks from all others somehow (other table, separator, ???, etc.). Personally I think this will make the page too complex to maintain. 3. Move the table to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs > Sheesh, I removed a table full of duplicated information and it could be > brought back easily. I did bring back content that had been displaced > without asking before. > Yes, direct editing has become kind of accepted behavior here. But I believe this practice must be stopped as soon as possible or it will eventually end up with a war of edits (remember the case with John Baer's wallpaper spec? That's only the beginning). I saw it happen already. It has a devastating effect on the community, particularly the core contributors, and I don't want it to happen here, especially after such a promising revival. Respectfully, -- Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
