On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:17 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote: > On Thursday 30 April 2009 04:02:00 John Baer wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 11:39 +0100, > [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > Message: 4 > > > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:56:39 +0200 > > > From: Thorsten Wilms <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Artwork Wiki Page - Draft 2 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Message-ID: <1240919799.3463.9.ca...@charly> > > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:06 -0400, John Baer wrote: > > > > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnBaer/SandBox > > > > > > > > I left justified the graphics and adjusted the text formatting. > > > > > > I'm for putting this into place now, but lets see what Kenneth > says. > > > > > > I would still set the sub-headings just bold, not italic. > > > > Agreed > > > > > "Need Help?" is not a good match for the table of contents. > > > > I changed the image to "Team Activities". > > > > > Aside of that, excellent work, John! > > I agree. The structure of the page is realy nice...the one thing that > still > rubs me the wrong way is the images used on the page. While they do > inspire a > feeling of simplicity and rawness which might make new members feel at > home I > get the feeling that they could be improved. Anyone have any ideas? > > Ken
Ken, I agree with you and Thorsten. I stripped all of the artwork from the latest draft with the exception of the Artwork Team banner. Leveraging the excellent work of the "breathe" submissions, I included the artist brush from the "applications-graphics" icon. If someone has a better submission that would be great. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnBaer/SandBox I like this draft the best. John -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
