----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 2:43 PM Subject: ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 45, Issue 71
> Send ubuntu-art mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-art digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Jaunty backgrounds (Kenneth Wimer) > 2. Re: [Breathe] system-search (Cory K.) > 3. Re: [Breathe] audio-input-microphone (Cory K.) > 4. Re: [Breathe]media-floppy (Cory K.) > 5. Re: [Breathe] system-search (Oliver Scholtz 1) > 6. Re: [Breathe] system-search (Cory K.) > 7. Re: [Breathe] software update (Cory K.) > 8. Re: [Breathe] audio-input-microphone (Thorsten Wilms) > 9. Re: [Breathe] audio-input-microphone (Cory K.) > 10. Re: [Breathe] software update (Oliver Scholtz 1) > 11. Re: [Breathe] system-search (Oliver Scholtz 1) > 12. Re: [Breathe] software update (Cory K.) > 13. Re: [Breathe] software update (Cory K.) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:10:49 +0100 > From: Kenneth Wimer <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty backgrounds > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" > > On Tuesday 24 March 2009 07:56:02 Matthew Lye wrote: >> I figure as the deadline for jaunty backgrounds has passed there are >> no new submissions being accepted. Being that I was late I haven't >> created a page but I have included the background I was looking at. >> >> Please let me know if submissions are still possible, and if I should >> submit this via the wiki. >> >> You can do anything you set your mind to when you have vision, >> determination, and and endless supply of expendable labor. >> >> <No tree's were harmed during this transmission. However, a great >> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced> > > Sorry, but the artwork for Jaunty as close to final. Work on Karmic will > start > soon, so keep an eye out for that! > > -- > Ken > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:34:08 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it has > a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so far. > > > -Cory K. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:41:18 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-input-microphone > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Thorsten Wilms wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:12 -0300, spg76 wrote: >>> I'll consider it. If this important? Sorry but I just don't know. >>> >> >> Only if there are no other considerations. Now that you posted >> system-search, we have to think of the orientation of all such icons. >> > > I'm unsure if this is important. I could see consistency in perspective > within a given category but left/right orientation? I'm unsure it's > important enough to commit to policy/a guideline. > >> Likely the orientation you used there happens to feel right for right >> handed people (?) >> > > Heh. Maybe, but I don't think it's worth worrying about. (lefties are > only about 10% of the population. screw 'em) :P > > > -Cory K. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:43:45 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe]media-floppy > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > daniel planas armangu? wrote: >> I made some small modifications to fit better. not perfect but I think >> it delivers. >> > > Are you happy with this one? Will you be focusing on other removable > media? > > > -Cory K. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:44:22 +0100 > From: Oliver Scholtz 1 <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <1237909462.20489.2.ca...@kubuntu> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 11:34 -0400 schrieb Cory K.: >> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it has >> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so >> far. >> >> >> -Cory K. >> > > Make system-search2 sharper wouldn't be a real problem. ;) > > The desicion is only in: > > - old-style Loupe? > - new-style Loupe? > > Sincerely Oliver > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:52:09 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: >> Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 11:34 -0400 schrieb Cory K.: >> >>> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it has >>> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so >>> far. >>> >> >> Make system-search2 sharper wouldn't be a real problem. ;) >> >> The desicion is only in: >> >> - old-style Loupe? >> - new-style Loupe? >> > > That's a design choice there. And really, it's better you finish 1 thing > at a time. gtk-media-* would be great to have completed. > > > -Cory K. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:57:04 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > daniel planas armangu? wrote: >> I think the software update icon deveria be orange. This maintains the >> human eye. >> > > I could go either way really, What is really at issue is that the shadow > is inconsistent and jagged. (on both versions) I'm using it now and it > really stands out badly. > > > -Cory K. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:17:55 +0100 > From: Thorsten Wilms <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-input-microphone > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <1237911475.10193.6.ca...@charly> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:41 -0400, Cory K. wrote: >> Thorsten Wilms wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:12 -0300, spg76 wrote: >> >> I'll consider it. If this important? Sorry but I just don't know. >> >> >> > >> > Only if there are no other considerations. Now that you posted >> > system-search, we have to think of the orientation of all such icons. >> > >> >> I'm unsure if this is important. I could see consistency in perspective >> within a given category but left/right orientation? I'm unsure it's >> important enough to commit to policy/a guideline. > > It is important for every case where you will see several such icons. > Having some / and other \ introduces unrest. > > > -- > Thorsten Wilms > > thorwil's design for free software: > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:28:27 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-input-microphone > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Thorsten Wilms wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:41 -0400, Cory K. wrote: >> >>> Thorsten Wilms wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:12 -0300, spg76 wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'll consider it. If this important? Sorry but I just don't know. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Only if there are no other considerations. Now that you posted >>>> system-search, we have to think of the orientation of all such icons. >>>> >>>> >>> I'm unsure if this is important. I could see consistency in perspective >>> within a given category but left/right orientation? I'm unsure it's >>> important enough to commit to policy/a guideline. >>> >> >> It is important for every case where you will see several such icons. >> Having some / and other \ introduces unrest. >> > > *If* they were going to be sitting along side each other in some > particular set, like "Categories" or "Mimes" I would agree. But as these > icons will sit in the menu generally amongst upstream app icons, where > there are no such guidelines, I don't think it's so important. > > I won't dictate here. I'll just leave it up to the folks who draw. > > > -Cory K. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:37:49 +0100 > From: Oliver Scholtz 1 <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <1237912670.23126.2.ca...@kubuntu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On Di, 2009-03-24 at 11:57 -0400, Cory K. wrote: >> daniel planas armangu? wrote: >> > I think the software update icon deveria be orange. This maintains the >> > human eye. >> > >> >> I could go either way really, What is really at issue is that the shadow >> is inconsistent and jagged. (on both versions) I'm using it now and it >> really stands out badly. >> >> >> -Cory K. >> > > Yes it's a Inkscape-rendered version you use ... hmm I will retouch the > small sizes again for that it renders better with Inki. > > Oliver > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:42:23 +0100 > From: Oliver Scholtz 1 <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <1237912943.23126.7.ca...@kubuntu> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Di, 2009-03-24 at 11:52 -0400, Cory K. wrote: >> Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: >> > Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 11:34 -0400 schrieb Cory K.: >> > >> >> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it >> >> has >> >> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so >> >> far. >> >> >> > >> > Make system-search2 sharper wouldn't be a real problem. ;) >> > >> > The desicion is only in: >> > >> > - old-style Loupe? >> > - new-style Loupe? >> > >> >> That's a design choice there. And really, it's better you finish 1 thing >> at a time. gtk-media-* would be great to have completed. >> >> >> -Cory K. >> > > okay okay :) > But Seba jumped to it firstly and I thought only what the community > would prefer more, so I did the second quickly ... :) ... back to > gtk-media. > > Oliver > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:48:44 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Oliver Scholtz wrote: >> On Di, 2009-03-24 at 11:57 -0400, Cory K. wrote: >> >>> I could go either way really, What is really at issue is that the shadow >>> is inconsistent and jagged. (on both versions) I'm using it now and it >>> really stands out badly. >>> >>> >> >> Yes it's a Inkscape-rendered version you use ... hmm I will retouch the >> small sizes again for that it renders better with Inki. >> > > No. Not at all. It's visible on the wiki as well. > > > -Cory K. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:43:43 -0400 > From: "Cory K." <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Oliver Scholtz wrote: >> *fixed >> > > Nice. Now look at it vs. Daniel's version. The hard shadows on this new > one are gone. > > > -Cory K. > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > > End of ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 45, Issue 71 > ****************************************** > -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
