Hi Shah, Quentin, On 13/08/2026 18:41, shj wrote: > Hi Quentin, Jerome, > > On 13.08.26 18:11, Quentin Schulz wrote: >> >> >> On 8/13/26 5:42 PM, shj wrote: >>> Hi Jerome, >>> >>> On 12.08.26 17:06, Jerome Forissier wrote: >>>>> With the series applied to for-main I got a CI error, see: >>>>> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? >>>>> url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.u-boot-project.org%2Fu-boot%2Fcustodians%2Fu- >>>>> boot-net%2F- >>>>> %2Fjobs%2F68484&data=05%7C02%7Cquentin.schulz%40cherry.de%7Cfcf4355cfe314a023a7e08def9538abe%7C5e0e1b5221b54e7b83bb514ec460677e%7C0%7C0%7C639222334948504305%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nNfbYn4Y0KW9fswuFVBAVh5ceKMSMFfACtCcOHpIdgw%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> I applied both NFS patches on top of current for-main and ran the sandbox >>> tests (I forgot to enable CONFIG_CMD_NFS in the sandbox config in the >>> previous nfs patch, and the nfs test is skipped, exactly as in your job, >>> sending v2). But overall I can't reproduce a failure, the failing test in >>> that job, dm_test_dhcp6_serverid_reject, isn't on for- main. I applied the >>> serverid series (fix + test) verbatim on current for-main (b752e441790) and >>> t_dm_dm_test_dhcp6_serverid_reject passed. >>> >>> Could you tell me which tree/commit you saw this on (the job checked out >>> for-main at 37f4c339, which I can't find on for-main now), or point me at >>> your merged test/dm/eth.c? I'll reproduce against exactly that. >>> >> >> https://git.u-boot-project.org/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-net/-/commits/37f4c339a4b20e8b60370d6b0f73560c04feef7c >> >>> Thanks, >>> Shah >>> >> > Thanks for the commit. I reproduced test failing on 37f4c339. On that tree > the test "test: dm: eth: add DHCPv6 oversized option regression tests" is > applied, but "net: dhcp6: bound received DUID option lengths" is not, so the > assert trips. Cherry-picking that fix onto 37f4c339 should makes the test pass
My bad. I recently changed my workflow from git pw to b4 and I obviously applied only one patch when my intent was to apply the series :-/ I will apply both patches to for-main for the next -rc. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- Jerome > > Thanks, > Shah >
