Hi Wolfgang, On 10/30/2012 11:04 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> By extracting these defines into a header, they can be re-used by other >> C sources as well. This will be done by the SPL framework OS boot >> support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> >> --- >> Changes in v6: >> - Fix compile warning: release.S:354:0: warning: "EPAPR_MAGIC" redefined > > Please re-read > http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions > > You are supposed to provide a _history_ of changes here, but instead > you describe only the latest change. This is not how it's suppoosed > to be done.
As you know this patch is part of a patch-series. And this is the first time that this patch has a change. So this summary covers the complete history for this patch. > Also, your submission includes neither any "In-reply-to:" nor any > "References:" header, i. e. there is no way to match it to any > previous mail thread. Yes, I should have done this. Sorry. > This is very bad. How are we supposed to know > what you are actually talking about, or where we would find any of the > previous patches or the other 6 patches of this series? In this version of the patch series, I only made this small change to this patch 1/7. I wanted to spare the list a resending of the complete patchset for such a small change. So what is the recommended way to do this? Is it really recommended/required to repost the complete patch series upon a small change in only one patch? No problem, I can do this. patman makes it very easy. :) Should I repost the complete series again? Thanks, Stefan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
