Dear Łukasz Dałek, > On 20.09.2012 00:56, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> That's why I use directive .word 0xea0003fe > > > > Check some arm instruction quick ref for what 0xea0003fe really is and if > > it really is necessary or anything else work just fine as well. > > 0xea0003fe is a branch instruction. 0x3fe is an offset (0x3fe << 2 + 8 = > 0x1000) > And I will left it. Bootloader checks for 4 bytes which have to be equal > 0xfe, 0x03, 0x00, 0xea and for 4 bytes at the offset 0x40 which have to > be equal E, C, E, C
It checks the branch instruction? What a piece of crap ... can't you replace it as well? > >> instead of > >> asm instruction 'b 0x1000'. But I don't know that: Can I leave that > >> .word directive or I can not. > >> > >> Another question: I asked in cover letter question about tools. Can I > >> add them in h2200 directory or should I put them somwhere else? > > > > I didn't receive the cover letter. > > Weird, I sent it with patches. With your address in CC field. > Btw. Did you got all 6 patches? Yes Next time add Cc: <> to the cover letter too. > Łukasz Dałek Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
