Dear Tom Rini, > On 09/19/12 04:32, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On 09/19/2012 01:28 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Again, NS16550 driver here. This code shouldn't be necessary. > >>> Also this board looks quite unmaintained as well. Perhaps its > >>> time to remove it from mainline? Not sure whom to ask, since no > >>> maintainer is listed. > >> > >> Exactly :-( > >> > >> Shall we not simply remove all boards that obviously miss > >> maintainer? > > > > I'm all for it. I'm currently working on a patch to remove support > > > > for the IOP480 platforms completely (ppc40x derivate). Some other > > boards might be good candidates as well... > > Since Marek has poked me about this in a few other contexts as well, > let me state my position for the moment.
I did, yet I was much less polite ;-) > Whatever boards a custodian I can't parse this :-( > is the de facto maintainer for and they don't believe makes sense to > continue carrying forward in mainline, they can and should submit > patches to remove. Conversely, if the custodian says "I'm fine > carrying these platforms", that's what they can and should do. > > And I have a few other things to say too, so I'll save that for a bit > later once I'm done drafting and considering. Drafting what exactly please? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
