Hello Wolfgang,

On 14.09.2012 20:31, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,

In message<1347645856-3326-1-git-send-email...@denx.de>  you wrote:
running the following script in u-boot:
setenv error 'if true; then
         echo **** ERROR ****
         exit;
fi'

I think I once tried to fix this, too.

See here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/94660
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/94661

Later, I rejected both these patches (and several other, unpublished
versions I came up with during testing), because none of these worked

I can understand exactly how you feel... I had also several patches...

for all tests really reliable.

Do you still have this test somewhere?

        rcode = source (addr, fit_uname);
+       if (rcode == -2) {
+               debug("Hit exit in script\n");
+               rcode = 0;
+       }

Hm... Note that "exit" can take an argment, which should be reflected
in the return code - I mean, would it not be wrong to reurn 0 if the
user has "exit 1" in his script?

Oh, Ok, this is a killing argument for this patch!

Please make sure to test this extensively.  When I was trying to fix a
few similar issues with hush, I quickly gave up because I decided it
would be an easier (and more promising) undertaking to update the whole
hush code to a more recent version of hush.

Hmm... Okay, so I have two options:

- fix "exit" with arguments
- update to a recent version of hush (where is the current code from?)
  But I have the gut feeling, that the problem is not in the original
  code, but in the u-boot adaptions, as the code in hush.c has a lot
  of "#ifndef __U_BOOT__" ...

bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to