On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:15:39PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 09/03/2012 07:58 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > On 09/02/2012 04:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> In message <1338454748-16315-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote: > >>> This patch adds support for the X600 SPEAr600 based board. Its also > >>> the first SPEAr600 board that uses the newly introduced SPEAr600 > >>> SPL support. Xloader is not necessary any more. By using the new > >>> "u-boot.spr" make target, one image will generated containing both, > >>> U-Boot SPL (with mkimage header as needed by the SPEAr BootROM, and > >>> the main U-Boot with mkimage header. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> > >>> Cc: Amit Virdi <amit.vi...@st.com> > >>> Cc: Vipin Kumar <vipin.ku...@st.com> > >>> --- > >>> v2: > >>> - Add hush support > >>> - Add bootcount & altbootcmd support > >> > >> What exactly is the state of these patches? When are these supposed > >> to me pulled into mainline? > > > > The state is "good for pulling". Now that the bootcount consolidation > > support is mainlined, this x600 support should really go in. > > > > Albert, will you pull this patch? > > This patch is also waiting for upstreaming quite some time. No comment > till now. > > Tom, can you pull it directly? Shall I assign it to you in patchworks?
Part of my plan is to lean on the custodians to cover their area of expertise as much as possible. I have a certain level of comfort with ARM and PowerPC (and even MIPS) but I'd really prefer things to go via custodians as much as possible. So if Albert hasn't picked this up (nor commented further) by -rc2 I will pick this series up. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
