Hello Scott, Thanks again for explaining. I will proceed based on your inputs.
Narayanasami. On 9/7/12, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On 09/07/2012 11:07 AM, narayanasami vijayaraghavan wrote: >> Hello Scott, Thanks for replying. >> We have few more products based on different >> ppc-processor/u-boot/linux, all are using cuImage. So, for better >> maintenance and uniformity, I am trying cuImage with this new h/w >> (P1020 & u-boot-2009.11). >> Could you please let me know that, >> - Can we make cuImage work with this combination? (by editing the >> wrapper/mkimage, etc) >> - What is the advantage of using uImage, instead of cuImage? > > cuImage was implemented specifically for compatibility with old boards > with old U-Boots that don't support device trees. If you want to use it > for anything else, you're on your own. It relies on an old, very > fragile and non-extensible interface for passing information from U-Boot > to Linux. > > Could you make it work? Probably. Should you? No. > > -Scott > > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
