Hi Stephen,
> On 08/24/2012 02:13 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Custom definitions of le_XX_to_int functions have been replaced with
> > standard ones, defined at <compiler.h>
>
> > diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
>
> > -/* Convert char[8] in little endian format to the host format
> > integer
> > - */
> > -static inline unsigned long long le64_to_int(unsigned char *le64)
> > -{
>
> So this original function takes a pointer to the value ...
>
> > /* Check the first_usable_lba and last_usable_lba are
> > within the disk. */ lastlba = (unsigned long long)dev_desc->lba;
> > - if (le64_to_int(pgpt_head->first_usable_lba) > lastlba) {
> > + if (le64_to_cpu(pgpt_head->first_usable_lba) > lastlba) {
>
> At this point in the series, first_usable_lba is a char[8], so this is
> passing the address of the first byte to both the original function
> le64_to_int(), and the replacement function le64_to_cpu(). However,
> le64_to_cpu() expects to receive the 64-bit value to swap, not a
> pointer to it - from compiler.h:
>
> #define _uswap_64(x, sfx) \
> ((((x) & 0xff00000000000000##sfx) >> 56) | \
> ...
> # define uswap_64(x) _uswap_64(x, ull)
>
> le:
> # define le64_to_cpu(x) (x)
> be:
> # define le64_to_cpu(x) uswap_64(x)
>
> So I think this patch breaks the code, and then the next patch fixes
> it, since it changes the type of first_usable_lba from char[8] to
> __le64?
First of all, thanks for very thorough review.
You are right, my fault. Patch 2/6 and 3/6 shall be squashed together.
When squashed, no errors and warnings appear.
I've unnecessary separated them to show this two step change. For the
sake of bisecting - those shall be squashed.
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux Platform Group
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
