On 08/30/2012 10:18 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> + * miscellaneous platform dependent initialisations
>>> + */
>>> +int misc_init_r(void)
>>> +{
>>> + /* Set to "n" for not verifying the uImage */
>>> + setenv("verify", "n");
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> Not good to enforce policy like this. Just don't set it in the config
>> file by default and let users do as they need.
>
> Hmm. I moved it to CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS as done by for eample
> u8500_href.h. Is that ok?
It defaults to no, I believe is the thing (so yes, there's a few bad
examples out there including, urk, one that I own).
>> [snip]
>>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
>>> index eaea1c8..5adbf0e 100644
>>> --- a/common/spl/spl.c
>>> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c
>>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void spl_parse_image_header(const struct image_header
>>> *header)
>>> u32 header_size = sizeof(struct image_header);
>>>
>>> if (__be32_to_cpu(header->ih_magic) == IH_MAGIC) {
>>> + /* Valid image. Extract information out of header */
>>> spl_image.size = __be32_to_cpu(header->ih_size) + header_size;
>>> spl_image.entry_point = __be32_to_cpu(header->ih_load);
>>> /* Load including the header */
>>
>> Just an extra comment, drop please. Or split out if you feel it's
>> really helpful. No strong opinion here other than not in the same patch
>> as the rest.
>
> Ok, I'll drop it, and the omap cleanup also. Not worth the merge
> effort.
>
> spl_ram_load_image... will I need to create some kind of #ifdef? Or
> would #ifdef BOOT_DEVICE_RAM do the trick?
Good point, yes, we should add CONFIG_SPL_RAM_DEVICE and document it in
docs/README.SPL and the toplevel README.
--
Tom
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
