Albert, > -----Original Message----- > From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.b...@aribaud.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:41 AM > To: Tom Warren > Cc: Lucas Stach; Allen Martin; swar...@wwwdotorg.org; s...@chromium.org; > thierry.red...@avionic-design.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] split tegra20 arm7 code into separate SPL > > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:10:19 -0700, Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com> > wrote: > > > Lucas, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:d...@lynxeye.de] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:54 PM > > > To: Tom Warren > > > Cc: Allen Martin; swar...@wwwdotorg.org; s...@chromium.org; > > > thierry.red...@avionic-design.de; u-boot@lists.denx.de > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/16] split tegra20 arm7 code into separate > > > SPL > > > > > > Hello Tom, > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2012, 09:55 -0700 schrieb Tom Warren: > > > > Allen/Albert, > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Allen Martin [mailto:amar...@nvidia.com] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 5:08 PM > > > > > To: Tom Warren; swar...@wwwdotorg.org; s...@chromium.org; > > > > > thierry.red...@avionic-design.de; d...@lynxeye.de > > > > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Allen Martin > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v10 00/16] split tegra20 arm7 code into separate > > > > > SPL > > > > > > > > > > This patch series fixes a long standing problem with the tegra20 > > > > > u-boot build. Tegra20 contains an ARM7TDMI boot processor and a > > > > > Cortex A9 main processor. Prior to this patch series this was > > > > > accomplished by #ifdefing out any armv7 code from the early boot > > > > > sequence and creating a single binary that runs on both both the > > > > > ARM7TDMI and A9. This was very fragile as changes to compiler > > > > > options or any additions or rearranging of the early boot code > > > > > could add additional armv7 specific code causing it to fail on > > > > > the ARM7TDMI. > > > > > > > > > > This patch series pulls all the armv4t code out into a separate > > > > > SPL that does nothing more than initialize the A9 and transfer > > > > > control to it. The resultint SPL and armv7 u-boot are > > > > > concatenated together into a single image. > > > > > > > > > > This patch series is also available from: > > > > > git://github.com/arm000/u-boot.git > > > > > branch: tegra-spl-v10 > > > > > > > > > > Changes: > > > > > v10: > > > > > - added fix to MAKEALL script so that it correctly parses new > > > > > boards.cfg > > > > > > > > I applied this to u-boot-tegra/master and pushed the new code > > > > upstream. > > > The pull request remains the same (except for the inclusion of the > > > MAKEALL patch, of course). I can send a new one if required - please > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Currently running a ./MAKEALL arm - I assume it'll complete w/o > > > > errors > > > (except for the ohci-hcd.c warnings I mentioned previously that are > > > not due to this patch series). > > > > > > Are you going to refresh the next branch anytime soon or are you > > > planing on doing this once the master branch is merged to > > > arm/master? > > > > I can refresh u-boot-tegra/next with Allen's V10 SPL patches and > > re-push it, but if the pull of the SPL code from u-boot-tegra/master > > is going to go into ARM/master anytime soon, I'd rather wait and just > > do it one final time. > > > > Albert - any idea of an ETA on pulling u-boot-tegra/master into > > ARM/master? > > If I'm not mistaken, the current u-boot-tegra/master branch has issues with > ./MAKEALL arm, not building everything it should. I'd rather not pull it > unless Allen's fix is added (or even better, unless the master branch is > force-updated to fix the original commit which introduced the issue, if you > and Allen are willing to go this far). I stated above (although not directly to you) that I'd applied Allen's v10 SPL patchset, which includes a MAKEALL arm fix, and pushed to u-boot-tegra/master. I can generate a new pull request if necessary, although the only change will be the addition of the MAKEALL patch. Please let me know if you need a new pull request.
Allen has also done a separate patchset (v2) for MAKEALL to correct some problems it had for both ARM and powerpc with duplicated builds, etc. I don't think it's necessary for Tegra specifically - my run of ./MAKEALL arm on current u-boot-tegra/master completed w/316 boards built, include the tegra20 boards. Tom > > > Tom > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Lucas > > Amicalement, > -- > Albert. -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
