On 08/23/2012 06:14 AM, Christian Riesch wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
>> - Convert the non-relocation part of board_init_f to spl_board_init,
>> turn on CONFIG_SPL_BOARD_INIT in the configs.
>> - Remove duplicated code.
>> - Add spl_boot_device() that returns the statically chosen boot device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c
>> b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c
>> index 74632e5..46c0bfd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/spl.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> * MA 02111-1307 USA
>> */
>> #include <common.h>
>> +#include <spl.h>
>> #include <asm/u-boot.h>
>> #include <asm/utils.h>
>> #include <nand.h>
>> @@ -29,14 +30,7 @@
>> #include <malloc.h>
>> #include <spi_flash.h>
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>> -
>> -DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>> -/* Define global data structure pointer to it*/
>> -static gd_t gdata __attribute__ ((section(".data")));
>> -static bd_t bdata __attribute__ ((section(".data")));
>> -
>> -#else
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>
>> void puts(const char *str)
>> {
>> @@ -54,43 +48,37 @@ void putc(char c)
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT */
>>
>> -inline void hang(void)
>> -{
>> - puts("### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###\n");
>> - for (;;)
>> - ;
>> -}
>> -
>> void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
>> {
>> + /* First, perform our low-level init. */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM365
>> dm36x_lowlevel_init(0);
>> #endif
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DA8XX
>> arch_cpu_init();
>> #endif
>> - relocate_code(CONFIG_SPL_STACK, NULL, CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Next we call relocate_code() with relocation target same as the
>> + * CONFIG_SYS_SPL_TEXT_BASE. This will result in relocation getting
>> + * skipped. Instead, only .bss initialization will happen.
>> + */
>> + relocate_code(CONFIG_SPL_STACK, &gdata, CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE);
>> }
>>
>> -void board_init_r(gd_t *id, ulong dummy)
>> +void spl_board_init(void)
>> {
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NAND_LOAD
>> - nand_init();
>> - puts("Nand boot...\n");
>> - nand_boot();
>> -#endif
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD
>> - mem_malloc_init(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE - CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN,
>> - CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN);
>> -
>> - gd = &gdata;
>> - gd->bd = &bdata;
>> - gd->flags |= GD_FLG_RELOC;
>> - gd->baudrate = CONFIG_BAUDRATE;
>> - serial_init(); /* serial communications setup */
>> - gd->have_console = 1;
>> + preloader_console_init();
>> +}
>>
>> - puts("SPI boot...\n");
>> - spi_boot();
>> +u32 spl_boot_device(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NAND_LOAD
>> + return BOOT_DEVICE_NAND;
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD)
>> + return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
>> +#else
>
> This will not apply on u-boot-ti since it is missing the MMC-SPL
> patches that have already been merged, right?
Indeed, there will be a certain amount of merge-pain I will have to deal
with to get this to apply. There's also conflicts with some of the
am33xx enhancements there or that I plan to push there shortly.
--
Tom
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
