On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Fabio Estevam, > >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> > int mxs_dma_go(int chan) >> > { >> > >> > - uint32_t timeout = 10000; >> > + uint32_t timeout = 10000000; >> >> Should we use a proper timeout mechanism instead? > > What would that be? I think 10 seconds is more than plenty for now.
Ok, but we need to change to unsigned int to be able to fit 10000000: --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mxs.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mxs.c @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ void enable_caches(void) #endif } -int mxs_wait_mask_set(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t mask, int timeout) +int mxs_wait_mask_set(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t mask, unsigned + int timeout) { while (--timeout) { if ((readl(®->reg) & mask) == mask) @@ -92,7 +93,8 @@ int mxs_wait_mask_set(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t ma return !timeout; } -int mxs_wait_mask_clr(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t mask, int timeout) +int mxs_wait_mask_clr(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t mask, unsigned + int timeout) { while (--timeout) { if ((readl(®->reg) & mask) == 0) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mxs/sys_proto.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/ar index 4610363..983b888 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mxs/sys_proto.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mxs/sys_proto.h @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ int mxs_reset_block(struct mxs_register_32 *reg); int mxs_wait_mask_set(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t mask, - int timeout); + unsigned int timeout); int mxs_wait_mask_clr(struct mxs_register_32 *reg, uint32_t mask, - int timeout); + unsigned int timeout); int mxsmmc_initialize(bd_t *bis, int id, int (*wp)(int)); Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot