Am Montag, den 06.08.2012, 09:46 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek: 
> Return value to find out if un/registration was succesful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu>
> 
> ---
> v2: Add comment to header file to describe parameters and return codes
> ---
>  arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c              |   16 +++++++++-------
>  arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h |   11 ++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c 
> b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c
> index ee67082..08f6bad 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/cpu/interrupts.c
> @@ -91,14 +91,13 @@ static void disable_one_interrupt(int irq)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> -/* adding new handler for interrupt */
> -void install_interrupt_handler (int irq, interrupt_handler_t * hdlr, void 
> *arg)
> +int install_interrupt_handler(int irq, interrupt_handler_t *hdlr, void *arg)
>  {
>       struct irq_action *act;
>       /* irq out of range */
>       if ((irq < 0) || (irq > irq_no)) {
>               puts ("IRQ out of range\n");
> -             return;
> +             return -1;
>       }
>       act = &vecs[irq];
>       if (hdlr) {             /* enable */
> @@ -106,11 +105,14 @@ void install_interrupt_handler (int irq, 
> interrupt_handler_t * hdlr, void *arg)
>               act->arg = arg;
>               act->count = 0;
>               enable_one_interrupt (irq);
> -     } else {                /* disable */
> -             act->handler = (interrupt_handler_t *) def_hdlr;
> -             act->arg = (void *)irq;
> -             disable_one_interrupt (irq);
> +             return 0;
>       }
> +
> +     /* Disable */
> +     act->handler = (interrupt_handler_t *) def_hdlr;
> +     act->arg = (void *)irq;
> +     disable_one_interrupt(irq);
> +     return 1;
>  }
>  
>  /* initialization interrupt controller - hardware */
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h 
> b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h
> index 6142b9c..e9640f5 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/microblaze_intc.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,16 @@ struct irq_action {
>       int count; /* number of interrupt */
>  };
>  
> -void install_interrupt_handler (int irq, interrupt_handler_t * hdlr,
> +/**
> + * Register and unregister interrupt handler rutines
> + *
> + * @param irq        IRQ number
> + * @param hdlr       Interrupt handler rutine
> + * @param arg        Pointer to argument which is passed to int. handler 
> rutine
> + * @return   0 if registration pass, 1 if unregistration pass,
> + *           or an error code < 0 otherwise
> + */
> +int install_interrupt_handler(int irq, interrupt_handler_t *hdlr,
>                                      void *arg);

Hi Michal,

why not two different functions here, one for registration, another one
for unregistration? To mee it is puzzling to use a 'install' function
for unregistration ...

... whatever, you should evaluate the return code in fsl_init2() too.

> 
>  int interrupts_init(void);


_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to