Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2012, 11:00 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren: > On 08/06/2012 06:19 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > > As discussed here [http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158202/] we want to > > use USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC still. > > > > However commit 5286f1ce dropped it regardless. Adding this back fixes a > > hang while handing over from SPL to U-Boot on Colibri T20. > > This probably makes sense, but Allen should comment on this. > > I wonder why I haven't seen any issue with this; perhaps SPL on all the > boards I tested ended up not using any libgcc functions? But in that > case, why would the Colibri board end up using them? > Could also be a toolchain issue. My normal workflow uses a toolchain without a libgcc, as we didn't needed it to this point. After porting over my changes to the new SPL boot I had to switch to a CodeSourcery toolchain containing a libgcc. So I'm not entirely sure where the problem lies, as I varied codebase and toolchain at one. But I confirmed that this patch works with both of my toolchains.
So yes, I'm really in favour of some comments. Thanks, Lucas _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
