On Thursday 02 August 2012 06:05:14 Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Mike Frysinger, > > > On Monday 14 May 2012 07:31:35 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Dear Mike Frysinger, > > > > > > > On Tuesday 01 May 2012 16:50:14 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > The gpio_from_string() call shall parse the incoming GPIO name > > > > > taken from the command line and return the GPIO number used within > > > > > U-Boot or return -1 on error. > > > > > > > > i.e. the already existing name_to_gpio() func > > > > > > You mean blackfin specific macro crap? Let's actually drop that and > > > switch over to this one. That was my intention from start. > > > > don't spout this crap. try reading the actual history on the lists for > > the background on the naming, and then try actually grepping the tree to > > see that multiple targets implement it. > > So ... it was chosen to be compatible with linux gpio api, that's what I > understood ... so I grepped the kernel source: > > linux-2.6# git grep name_to_gpio drivers/gpio/ > linux-2.6# git grep name_to_gpio include/ > linux-2.6# git grep gpio_to_name include/ > linux-2.6# git grep gpio_to_name drivers/gpio/ > > Nothing.
the naming convention is inline with the linux naming convention. there is no concept in linux of stringifying a GPIO number. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
