Dear Tom Rini, > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:31:14AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > + debug("%s: %s 0x%p\n", __func__, cmd_buf, cmd_buf); > > > > > > > + run_command(cmd_buf, 0); > > > > > > > > > > > > Holy Moly ... can we not make this into simple calls to those > > > > > > subsystems ? Instead invoking command is crazy ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Are they really simple? There's a few other places we do this, and > > > > > so long as it's documented that DFU depends on CONFIG_FAT_WRITE > > > > > for writing to fat and so forth. > > > > > > > > Well ain't it easier to call fat_write() or similar? > > > > > > Assuming that most of the logic in do_fat_fswrite is needed, no. And I > > > think a good portion of it is, at first glance at least. > > > > Abstracting it out into a function won't cut it? > > My inclination would be to say that seems a bit sillier than just using > run_command(...) to call the existing command.
Whose's syntax will likely soon change, breaking all this :-( Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot