Dear Alexandre Belloni, On 02.07.2012 14:55, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:01:00PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote :
>>> diff --git a/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h >>> b/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h >>> index 07b1968..ef25fa5 100644 >>> --- a/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h >>> +++ b/include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h >>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ >>> #define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET 0x4200 >>> #define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_DATAFLASH_LOGIC_ADDR_CS0 + >>> CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET) >>> #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE 0x4200 >>> -#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "cp.b 0xC0042000 0x22000000 0x210000; bootm" >>> +#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "cp.b 0xC0084000 0x22000000 0x210000; bootm" >> >> also sorry, but size is wrong here! We reduced the partition to >> 0x1CE000, it is about 1.8 MiB now and not 2 MiB as before. >> > > Right, I didn't really care about the end of the kernel partition as the > 9261ek has an 8MiB dataflash and my rootfs is in NAND. The kernel is > around 1.7MiB using the default configuration. Maybe, we should also > extend its partition ? well, I don't care about that too cause we usually don't have a dataflash in our devices. I think for the eval kits it would be nice to have a board support package which can be loaded from different media. Unfortunately I used to work with bare UBoot, vanilla kernel a.s.o. Therefore I have not such deep insight into the atmel provided bsp's. In short words: I tend to say we should increase the space for kernel partition but I fear to break some special bsp's. As I can see the kernel do not provide a special mapping here. If you are not aware of some other source (e.g. linux4sam), let us increase the space for kernel a bit. Best regards Andreas Bießmann _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
