Dear Stephen Warren, In message <4fe4fd2f.4010...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote: > > >> OK, that's fine; I'll rely solely on patch email then. I just figured on > >> saving Albert some git am work, seeing as how many other single SoCs are > >> handled via git pull already. > > > > Are there? Which for example? > > Tegra does this for sure. There are also u-boot-ti.git, > u-boot-samsung.git, and u-boot-marvell.git that I believe are for the > same purpose.
All these handle a number of processors - note that (with the exception of tegra) these are explicitly named as vendor trees, collingting all processors from some silicon vendors. Have a closer look at the imx (Freescale) or TI or Samsung or Marvell trees - all these handle a pretty large number of different SoCs. We can discuss to add a Broadcom repository one day - but only after it turns out that there is sufficiently large traffic here on the list to justify another split. Given that Broadcom has essentially zero coverage in mainline U-Boot, there is some way to go before we reach such a point. Just for a single SoC it makes no sense to set up a new custodian tree. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Life is a game. Money is how we keep score. - Ted Turner _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
