Dear Stefano Babic, > On 17/06/2012 19:50, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>> But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because > >>> Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches. > >> > >> And I like it more, it looks less like a typo. > > > > Sorry; I didn't get what you meant ... should it go or not? > > Hi Otavio, > > I make also my point clearer for Marek: my point is that the behavior > for all i.MX must be consistent. If you change here, please change also > for i.MX31 (that returns "unknown in print_cpuinfo) and for other SOCs > that returns "unknown" in print_cpuinfo() - or let the code as now.
Ah, I thought it was about the revision. Ok, whatever way is fine by me. > Best regards, > Stefano Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
