On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote:
> I like that there will be support for i.MX23, too. But I dislike that
> everything takes the name "MX28". As you suggest in your subject, maybe
> it is time to rename directories, and use "mxs" (as in kernel) instead
> of mx28.
I have it in my wip branch; I'd like to hold it until I have mx23
working so I have freedom to rework the patches.
I can split it on mx28 part and leave mx23 on my branch; this does
looks nicer for me.
>> +static u8 get_cpu_rev(void)
>> +{
>> + struct mx28_digctl_regs *digctl_regs =
>> + (struct mx28_digctl_regs *)MXS_DIGCTL_BASE;
>> +
>> + return readl(&digctl_regs->hw_digctl_chipid) & 0x0000F;
>> +}
>
> Everywhere (i.MX, omap, ...) get_cpu_rev returns u32. The function is
> currently exported, too.
I change it then.
Will fix it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
