> -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] > Sent: 12 June 2012 14:04 > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: Valentin Longchamp; prafu...@mavell.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; > Gerlando Falauto > Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] arm/km: add kmnusa board support > > On 06/12/2012 06:39 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com] > >> Sent: 07 June 2012 15:37 > >> To: prafu...@mavell.com > >> Cc: Holger Brunck; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp; > Gerlando > >> Falauto; Prafulla Wadaskar > >> Subject: [PATCH 04/20] arm/km: add kmnusa board support > >> > >> From: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> > >> > >> This board is similar to portl2, but it has the u-boot environment > >> in a SPI NOR flash and not in an i2c eeprom like portl2 have. > >> > >> Some other details: > >> - IVM EEPROM is at adress: pca9547:70:9 > >> - PCI is enabled > >> - PIGGY4 is connected via MV88E6352 simple switch. There is no phy > >> between the simple switch and the kirkwood. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> > >> cc: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.fala...@keymile.com> > >> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> > >> --- > >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + > >> board/keymile/km_arm/128M16-1.cfg | 294 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Please avoid file names starting with numbers. > > > > would sdram128M16-1.cfg be ok? The reason for this numbering is to > have a chance > to know which organisation this RAM has. > > >> board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c | 9 +- > >> boards.cfg | 1 + > >> include/configs/km/km_arm.h | 44 +++++- > >> include/configs/km_kirkwood.h | 67 +++++++-- > >> 6 files changed, 392 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 board/keymile/km_arm/128M16-1.cfg > >> > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > >> index 0445539..aa11268 100644 > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@ -738,6 +738,7 @@ Sergey Lapin <sla...@ossfans.org> > >> Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> > >> > >> km_kirkwood ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) > >> + kmnusa ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) > > > > Again.... I would like to suggest to separate out new boards > addition, bugfixes/updates specific to km_*boards and generic kirkwood > specific patches. > > > > It's always faster to merger small patch series that big one. > > > > Yes ok, but was has this to do with this patch? What is meant to be > kirkwood > specific? This is all board related code.
I agree, let's separate out - 1. bugfix/updates patch series to current code 2. "Kirkwood specific" means the changes to the Kirkwood related file that may affects other boards, for ex arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mach-kirkwood/* 3. Additional board supports And if possible these patches should be independent so that can be pulled independently Regards. Prafulla . . . _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot