> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com]
> Sent: 12 June 2012 14:08
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Valentin Longchamp; prafu...@mavell.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> Gerlando Falauto
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] arm/km: use correct kw_gpio function for
> NAND/SPI switching
> 
> On 06/12/2012 06:39 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
> >> Sent: 07 June 2012 15:37
> >> To: prafu...@mavell.com
> >> Cc: Valentin Longchamp; holger.bru...@keymile.com; u-
> >> b...@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Prafulla Wadaskar
> >> Subject: [PATCH 02/20] arm/km: use correct kw_gpio function for
> >> NAND/SPI switching
> >>
> >> This used to be done with registers direct access, which is not
> clear
> >> and optimal.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com>
> >> cc: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.fala...@keymile.com>
> >> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >>  board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> ---
> >> --------
> >>  include/configs/km/km_arm.h   |    1 +
> >>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> >> b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> >> index ed12b5c..e4ae1fb 100644
> >> --- a/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> >> +++ b/board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c
> >> @@ -247,15 +247,12 @@ int board_early_init_f(void)
> >>    kirkwood_mpp_conf(kwmpp_config, NULL);
> >>
> >>    /*
> >> -   * The FLASH_GPIO_PIN switches between using a
> >> +   * The KM_FLASH_GPIO_PIN switches between using a
> >>     * NAND or a SPI FLASH. Set this pin on start
> >>     * to NAND mode.
> >>     */
> >> -  tmp = readl(KW_GPIO0_BASE);
> >> -  writel(tmp | FLASH_GPIO_PIN , KW_GPIO0_BASE);
> >> -  tmp = readl(KW_GPIO0_BASE + 4);
> >> -  writel(tmp & (~FLASH_GPIO_PIN) , KW_GPIO0_BASE + 4);
> >> -
> >> +  kw_gpio_set_valid(KM_FLASH_GPIO_PIN, 1);
> >> +  kw_gpio_direction_output(KM_FLASH_GPIO_PIN, 1);
> >>  #if defined(CONFIG_SOFT_I2C)
> >>    /* init the GPIO for I2C Bitbang driver */
> >>    kw_gpio_set_valid(KM_KIRKWOOD_SDA_PIN, 1);
> >> @@ -284,35 +281,41 @@ int board_init(void)
> >>    return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +int km_hw_spi_bus_claim(int on)
> >> +{
> >> +  int gpio_value = !on;
> >> +
> >> +  if (on) {
> >> +          kwmpp_config[0] = MPP0_SPI_SCn;
> >> +          kwmpp_config[1] = MPP1_SPI_MOSI;
> >> +          kwmpp_config[2] = MPP2_SPI_SCK;
> >> +          kwmpp_config[3] = MPP3_SPI_MISO;
> >> +  } else {
> >> +          kwmpp_config[0] = MPP0_NF_IO2;
> >> +          kwmpp_config[1] = MPP1_NF_IO3;
> >> +          kwmpp_config[2] = MPP2_NF_IO4;
> >> +          kwmpp_config[3] = MPP3_NF_IO5;
> >> +  }
> >
> > NACK...
> >
> 
> Could you please be a bit more verbose. Why do you NACK this? This
> code is only
> related to our boards...

Dear Holger
We have already patches for Kirkwood-spi in place that address this.
So we have to use this framework.

Ref: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-June/125574.html

Regards..
Prafulla . . .
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to