On 05/24/2012 10:38 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com] >> Sent: 16 May 2012 16:24 >> To: Prafulla Wadaskar; holger.bru...@keymile.com >> Cc: Valentin Longchamp; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Holger Brunck; Prafulla >> Wadaskar >> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions >> board_spi_claim/release_bus >> >> This allows a final, board specific, step in the claim/relase_bus >> function for the SPI controller, which may be needed for some hardware >> designs. > > NAK, this is not needed if earlier two patches in the patch series are in > place. >
In our case, this is still needed. As I had already explained you in the previous discussion, even with the generic approach, our hardware design requires one access to an additional signal (a GPIO) to configure an external HW multiplexer which is present to electrically remove the Nand Flash device from the signals used by the SPI bus and put it back when the accesses are over. That's why my first implementation was only relying on these weak functions. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
