On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Daniel Stodden <daniel.stod...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Have you tried to put the bootrom in the debug mode ? >> >> https://doukki.net/doku.php?id=wiki:tutoriels:u-boot.uart#boot_from_uart0 >> >> Réfs : >> http://www.marvell.com/embedded-processors/kirkwood/assets/FS_88F6180_9x_6281_OpenSource.pdf >> >> May be it can helps to understand the 1.11 and 1.21 differences ? > > I never played with it. But according to the documentation, it's rather > orthogonal to image upload. You get a command line interface. However, I > see no command references in the docs. > > Might support entering it in kwboot in the future, but I don't see how > it's would help with the protocol issues. > > Daniel >
@ Daniel: Just 2 thoughts... 1. (less important...) I wonder if it is possible to query the BootROM version via UART... if possible, on detecting 111 @ offset ff00003c, have it print "Not Supported on V1.11 BootROM" 2. (more importantly) : I am actually _just_fine__ w/ the level of function in your current V2. You've already done a good service to those work on Kirkwood stuff, and would want to press anyone into fixing something that they/we didn't break and possibly can't be fixed. [There may well be a reason no one has gotten anything w/ the V1.11 BootROM to work with UART-booting.] For me, your V2 already feels "mature". Its a big step forward from where we were. Just my 2 cents, regards & thanks, Dave _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
